Grassley's jumping on the crazy train isn't much of a surprise, but it was unnecessary. Representing one of the most aged state populations in the U.S., the senator must have felt safer stoking the fear, rather than rebutting it. However, during his recess town halls, Grassley has failed to mention he -- along with many other Republicans -- voted in favor of a similar measure in 2003.
Remember the 2003 Medicare prescription drug bill, the one that passed with the votes of 204 GOP House members and 42 GOP Senators? Anyone want to guess what it provided funding for? Did you say counseling for end-of-life issues and care? Ding ding ding!!
Let's go to the bill text, shall we? "The covered services are: evaluating the beneficiary's need for pain and symptom management, including the individual's need for hospice care; counseling the beneficiary with respect to end-of-life issues and care options, and advising the beneficiary regarding advanced care planning." The only difference between the 2003 provision and the infamous Section 1233 that threatens the very future and moral sanctity of the Republic is that the first applied only to terminally ill patients. Section 1233 would expand funding so that people could voluntarily receive counseling before they become terminally ill.
I don't know what is more disgusting: the "death panel" lies - truly reprehensible - or the degree to which ppl can be willing dumbasses.
Some of them believe this shit b/c of ideological blindness.
Some of them buy this shit b/c they are truly just dumb as rocks.
Or should my vote go to the pandering, hypocritical, gutless wonders in congress?
August 18, 2009 at 6:59 AM
What do you think insurance beuracrats are????? hello!!!!!! THEY determine whom you can and cannot see and whom is and is not in "network" and what is and is not covered.