Current Events & Hot Topics

Featured Posts
-Celestial-
Supreme Court rules Drug Companies exempt from Lawsuits
July 8, 2013 at 2:16 AM

July 7, 2013

Supreme Court rules Drug Companies exempt from Lawsuits

 July 7, 2013. Washington. In case readers missed it with all the coverage of the Trayvon Martin murder trial and the Supreme Court’s rulings on gay marriage and the Voting Rights Act, the US Supreme Court also made a ruling on lawsuits against drug companies for fraud, mislabeling, side effects and accidental death. From now on, 80 percent of all drugs are exempt from legal liability.

Drug companies failed to warn patients that toxic epidermal necrolysis was a side effect. But the Supreme Court ruled they're still not liable for damages.


In a 5-4 vote, the US Supreme Court struck down a lower court’s ruling and award for the victim of a pharmaceutical drug’s adverse reaction. According to the victim and the state courts, the drug caused a flesh-eating side effect that left the patient permanently disfigured over most of her body. The adverse reaction was hidden by the drug maker and later forced to be included on all warning labels. But the highest court in the land ruled that the victim had no legal grounds to sue the corporation because its drugs are exempt from lawsuits.



Karen Bartlett vs. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company

In 2004, Karen Bartlett was prescribed the generic anti-inflammatory drug Sulindac, manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceutical, for her sore shoulder. Three weeks after taking the drug, Bartlett began suffering from a disease called, ‘toxic epidermal necrolysis’. The condition is extremely painful and causes the victim’s skin to peel off, exposing raw flesh in the same manner as a third degree burn victim.

Karen Bartlett sued Mutual Pharma in New Hampshire state court, arguing that the drug company included no warning about the possible side effect. A court agreed and awarded her $21 million. The FDA went on to force both Mutual, as well as the original drug manufacturer Merck & Co., to include the side effect on the two drugs’ warning labels going forward.

Now, nine years after the tragedy began, the US Supreme Court overturned the state court’s verdict and award. Justices cited the fact that all generic drugs and their manufacturers, some 80% of all drugs consumed in the United States, are exempt from liability for side effects, mislabeling or virtually any other negative reactions caused by their drugs. In short, the Court ruled that the FDA has ultimate authority over pharmaceuticals in the US. And if the FDA says a drug is safe, that takes precedent over actual facts, real victims and any and all adverse reactions.

Court ruling

The Court’s ruling a week ago on behalf of generic drug makers is actually a continuation of a ruling made by the same Court in 2011. At that time, the Justices ruled that the original inventors and manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs, also known as ‘name brand’ drugs, are the only ones that can be sued for mislabeling, fraud or adverse drug reactions and side effects. If the generic versions of the drugs are made from the exact same formula and labeled with the exact same warnings as their brand name counterparts, the generics and their manufacturers were not liable.

The Court ruled, “Because it is impossible for Mutual and other similarly situated manufacturers to comply with both state and federal law, New Hampshire's warning-based design-defect cause of action is pre-empted with respect to FDA-approved drugs sold in interstate commerce."

And that ruling flies in the face of both common sense and justice. And as Karen Bartlett can now attest, it leaves 240 million Americans unprotected from the deadly and torturous side effects of pharmaceutical drugs. As a reminder, the number one cause of preventable or accidental death in the US is pharmaceutical drugs.


Immediately upon the Supreme Court’s ruling, both drug manufacturers and Wall Street investors were celebrating. As one financial analyst pointed out, drug company profits should skyrocket going forward. Not only do the pharmaceutical companies no longer have to worry about safety or side effects, they are exempt from the multi-million dollar court-imposed settlements awarded to victims of their drugs.

One industry critic was quoted by Reuters after the verdict. "Today's court decision provides a disincentive for generic makers of drugs to monitor safety of their products and to make sure that they have a surveillance system in place to detect adverse events that pose a threat to patients," Michael Carome, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group told the news outlet.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) was quick to react to the ruling by writing a stern letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, "A consumer should not have her rights foreclosed simply because she takes the generic version of a prescription drug.”

But an attorney for the drug companies, Jay P. Lefkowitz, took the opposing position saying, “It makes much more sense to rely on the judgments of the scientific and medical experts at the FDA, who look at drug issues for the nation at large, than those of a single state court jury that only has in front of it the terribly unfortunate circumstances of an adverse drug reaction."

In other words, if the FDA says something is safe, it doesn’t matter if that decision is wrong or the result of lies, fraud or deception on the part of the world’s pharmaceutical companies. And there’s no way to sue the FDA for being wrong and costing millions of unsuspecting Americans their lives. That result leaves 240 million Americans unprotected from an industry responsible for more preventable deaths in the US than any other cause.

 http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/q32013/supreme-court-rules-drug-companies-exempt-from-lawsuits/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/24/usa-court-generics-idUSL2N0F00K820130624

Replies

  • kailu1835
    July 8, 2013 at 2:22 AM
    And not for the first time. Our government couldn't give 2 shits about us.
  • LiliM
    by LiliM
    July 8, 2013 at 3:55 AM

    This Supreme Court will be remembered as the one that turned our country over to companies and corporations.

    I felt that Roberts was one of the worst possible picks for the SCOTUS, much less the Chief Justice.  And so far, nothing I have seen has shown me differently.

  • unspecified42
    July 8, 2013 at 4:26 AM
    The problem of that if the generic medications aren't able to just use the same warnings as the name brand, they will have to do all of the research over again and poof, no affordable medications.

    There is no such thing as a free lunch, folks. Medication development isn't free. Research isn't free. Clinical trials aren't free. FDA approval isn't free.

    Don't like it? Find a different way to run healthcare in America. Please. No shit it doesn't work, but imagine the impact of no longer having inexpensive medications.
  • stormcris
    July 8, 2013 at 4:52 AM

    The revolving door 

  • LaughCryLive
    July 8, 2013 at 4:57 AM
    I agree.

    Also, I am so sick of all these drug lawsuits. Everyone knows birth control causes clots. Don't take it and get a clot and sue!!!


    Quoting unspecified42:

    The problem of that if the generic medications aren't able to just use the same warnings as the name brand, they will have to do all of the research over again and poof, no affordable medications.



    There is no such thing as a free lunch, folks. Medication development isn't free. Research isn't free. Clinical trials aren't free. FDA approval isn't free.



    Don't like it? Find a different way to run healthcare in America. Please. No shit it doesn't work, but imagine the impact of no longer having inexpensive medications.

  • GirlWithANikon
    July 8, 2013 at 5:06 AM

    I think it is unfair to say everyone knows birth control causes clots, or like wise of other medications. I know birth control causes clots but if I suddenly came down with something I have no experience with how would I know what the medications side effects are if they are not on the inserts or company website? I am also assuming that if they do not provide these warnings due to research you cannot call and ask and be told it just may eat your flesh.

    It sounds insane to look at all the basic things people in America do not know and then assume everyone knows medication side effects.


    Quoting LaughCryLive:

    I agree.

    Also, I am so sick of all these drug lawsuits. Everyone knows birth control causes clots. Don't take it and get a clot and sue!!!


    Quoting unspecified42:

    The problem of that if the generic medications aren't able to just use the same warnings as the name brand, they will have to do all of the research over again and poof, no affordable medications.



    There is no such thing as a free lunch, folks. Medication development isn't free. Research isn't free. Clinical trials aren't free. FDA approval isn't free.



    Don't like it? Find a different way to run healthcare in America. Please. No shit it doesn't work, but imagine the impact of no longer having inexpensive medications.



  • LaughCryLive
    July 8, 2013 at 5:14 AM
    Clots from birth control i on TV and the inserts. It's not the companies problem if they provide you with the information and you choose to ignore it.


    Quoting GirlWithANikon:

    I think it is unfair to say everyone knows birth control causes clots, or like wise of other medications. I know birth control causes clots but if I suddenly came down with something I have no experience with how would I know what the medications side effects are if they are not on the inserts or company website? I am also assuming that if they do not provide these warnings due to research you cannot call and ask and be told it just may eat your flesh.

    It sounds insane to look at all the basic things people in America do not know and then assume everyone knows medication side effects.



    Quoting LaughCryLive:

    I agree.



    Also, I am so sick of all these drug lawsuits. Everyone knows birth control causes clots. Don't take it and get a clot and sue!!!





    Quoting unspecified42:

    The problem of that if the generic medications aren't able to just use the same warnings as the name brand, they will have to do all of the research over again and poof, no affordable medications.





    There is no such thing as a free lunch, folks. Medication development isn't free. Research isn't free. Clinical trials aren't free. FDA approval isn't free.





    Don't like it? Find a different way to run healthcare in America. Please. No shit it doesn't work, but imagine the impact of no longer having inexpensive medications.






  • AdrianneHill
    July 8, 2013 at 5:14 AM
    Good Christ what a terrible ruling. Another blow for almighty capitalism
  • jehosoba84
    July 8, 2013 at 10:34 AM

    This kind of ruling chills my blood.

  • Mommabearbergh
    July 8, 2013 at 10:46 AM

    except the problem is now they can provide you no label or warning and then something happens you can't sue because they are exempt so then your just sol with lots of hospital bills. 

    Quoting LaughCryLive:

    Clots from birth control i on TV and the inserts. It's not the companies problem if they provide you with the information and you choose to ignore it.


    Quoting GirlWithANikon:

    I think it is unfair to say everyone knows birth control causes clots, or like wise of other medications. I know birth control causes clots but if I suddenly came down with something I have no experience with how would I know what the medications side effects are if they are not on the inserts or company website? I am also assuming that if they do not provide these warnings due to research you cannot call and ask and be told it just may eat your flesh.

    It sounds insane to look at all the basic things people in America do not know and then assume everyone knows medication side effects.



    Quoting LaughCryLive:

    I agree.



    Also, I am so sick of all these drug lawsuits. Everyone knows birth control causes clots. Don't take it and get a clot and sue!!!





    Quoting unspecified42:

    The problem of that if the generic medications aren't able to just use the same warnings as the name brand, they will have to do all of the research over again and poof, no affordable medications.





    There is no such thing as a free lunch, folks. Medication development isn't free. Research isn't free. Clinical trials aren't free. FDA approval isn't free.





    Don't like it? Find a different way to run healthcare in America. Please. No shit it doesn't work, but imagine the impact of no longer having inexpensive medications.







Current Events & Hot Topics

Active Posts in All Groups
More Active Posts
Featured Posts in All Groups
More Featured Posts