The leader of the Detroit Archdiocese has said that if Catholic congregants support same-sex marriage they should be denied Communion, and he‚Äôs not alone in that thinking.
The Archbishop of Detroit Allen Vigneron on Sunday told the Detroit Free Press that he agrees with a senior Catholic lawyer that those who support same-sex marriage should be denied Communion. Vigneron reportedly told the Free Press:
‚ÄúFor a Catholic to receive holy Communion and still deny the revelation Christ entrusted to the church is to try to say two contradictory things at once: ‚ÄėI believe the church offers the saving truth of Jesus, and I reject what the church teaches.‚Äô In effect, they would contradict themselves. This sort of behavior would result in publicly renouncing one‚Äôs integrity and logically bring shame for a double-dealing that is not unlike perjury.‚ÄĚ
For a number of years now, senior Catholic figures have threatened public officials, like Rep. Nancy Pelosi, with a denial of Communion over issues like pro-choice reforms, and now increasingly, this is applied to the issue of same-sex marriage.
Vigneron‚Äôs comments chase those of Edward Peters, a lawyer and adviser to the Vatican who teaches Catholic canon law at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit and who, in a blog post last month, wrote:
‚ÄúThe Catholic Church teaches, through its ordinary magisterium and with infallible certainty, that marriage exists only between one man and one woman [...] Catholics who promote ‚Äúsame-sex marriage‚ÄĚ act contrary to Canon 209 ¬ß 1 and should not approach for holy Communion per Canon 916. Depending on the facts of the case, they also risk having holy Communion withheld from them under Canon 915, being rebuked under Canon 1339 ¬ß 2, and/or being sanctioned under Canon 1369 for gravely injuring good morals.‚ÄĚ
Peters goes on to say those engaging in a same-sex marriage or those who have helped facilitate a same-sex marriage could also be barred from Communion.
Whether as damage control or an empty attempt to answer criticism, the diocese‚Äôs spokesperson, Joe Kohn, issued the following statement on Monday:
The archbishop‚Äôs focal point here is not ‚Äúgay marriage‚ÄĚ; it is a Catholic‚Äôs reception of Holy Communion. If a Catholic publicly opposes the church on a serious matter of the church‚Äôs teaching, any serious matter ‚ÄĒ for example, whether it be a rejection of the divinity of Christ, racist beliefs, support for abortion or support for redefining marriage ‚ÄĒ that would contradict the public affirmation they would make of the church‚Äôs beliefs by receiving Communion.
As the archbishop states, the pastors of the church are ready to assist Catholics to help them understand and avoid this conflict.
Vigneron called Catholics supporting same-sex marriage tantamount to perjury. You don‚Äôt get to throw around words like that and then pretend, as Kohn does above, that there‚Äôs no argument to be fought.
Now an initial reaction to this might be that the position, while odious, is perfectly within the realm of religious freedom of expression and that the church can define its own rules however it sees fit. Fine. Move on. Except that while in some circumstances that is true, there‚Äôs a problem here, isn‚Äôt there?
Increasingly, a majority of Catholic congregants support, if not same-sex marriage in the religious sense, marriage equality in the secular and legal sense. A recent poll says that support has now surpassed the majority mark at 54%. When asked about this, they often cite their religious beliefs. An example would be the aforementioned Nancy Pelosi, who has said her faith and her self-avowed relationship with God compels her to oppose discrimination.
So what of a religious right to express that aspect of one‚Äôs faith by supporting same-sex marriage?
Well, it seems the Catholic church is dealing with this by defining those people out of being Catholic and denying them Holy Communion, a key pillar for Catholic identity.
Technically the church can do whatever it wants in that regard, but one thing is certain. With positions like this, the church could shed support in swathes and elegantly marginalize itself in only a matter of decades because what the church thinks it means to be Catholic really doesn‚Äôt seem to be what its congregants think Catholicism is, and this is a possibly fatal disconnect.
In the short term at least, it makes the church‚Äôs staunch cries about how we must protect religious rights and rally against marriage equality sound even more hollow.
Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/catholic-and-support-gay-marriage-no-communion-for-you.html#ixzz2QGJAFKdc
What's with the picture?
Purposefully obtuse. How surprising.
Sorry but don't you think it's a little lazy reporting to attack the Catholic Church on Communion and post a picture of non-Catholic communion?
As for the story I fully support elected officials who identify as Catholic while at the same time publicly deny and intentionally misrepresent Church teachings be denied Communion.
I thought the same thing. I was a Protestant before converting to Catholicism 15 years ago. That is a picture of a Protestant communion, not a Catholic one. Perhaps the writer of the article didn't know there was a difference.
What's with the picture?
Sad that you are such a hater. A very, very, very tiny number of priests were involved in those horrible acts. There are more schoolteachers that molest children than Catholic priests. There are more Protestant ministers that molest children than Catholic priests. There are more parents that molest children than Catholic priests. But for those who hate religion, they just see what they want to see.
Support marriage equality, don't get to eat Jesus.
Molest children, get to eat Jesus.
Yeah, makes perfect sense.