Current Events & Hot Topics

Featured Posts
Veni.Vidi.Vici.
Liberal doesn't always equal pro-choice
April 2, 2013 at 7:17 AM

How does a person who seemingly opposes biased information manage to author such a biased article?

Inconvenient Headlines

Mona Charen's column is released once a week.

It's a deeply felt conviction among liberals that they are the caring party. It's not too much to say that liberals are quite confident that they are nicer, more moral people than conservatives.

It must require truly titanic powers of denial for the "moral" and "compassionate" party to maintain its position on abortion — a position that leads them into some macabre rationalizations. Consciences among the morally superior party are agreeably quiescent.

But recent headlines have not been similarly cooperative. In Florida, the legislature is considering a variant of the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act," which would require that abortionists provide medical assistance to infants who are "accidentally" born alive and kicking during an abortion. (Then State Senator Barack Obama vociferously opposed similar legislation in Illinois.)

Ms. Alisa LaPolt Snow, representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified against the bill. Florida representative Jim Boyd, apparently unsure that he had understood her correctly, asked:

"So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because I'm almost in disbelief. If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?"

Ms. Snow responded that her organization "believes that any decision that's made should be left up to the woman, her family and the physician." In short, as the Weekly Standard summarized, Florida Planned Parenthood is in favor of "post-birth abortion." This is consistent with the position of the president of the United States and most members of the caring party.

Ms. Snow was asked why she didn't support simply transporting a breathing, moving infant to a hospital where he or she would have the best chance of survival. Snow developed a sudden concern for ambulance convenience: "(T)hose situations where it is in a rural health care setting, the hospital is 45 minutes or an hour away, that's the closest trauma center or emergency room. You know there's just some logistical issues involved that we have some concerns about." Really? Logistical concerns?

So if a baby is brought to a rural clinic suffering from, say, meningitis, and the nearest trauma center is 45 minutes away, does Planned Parenthood have "concerns" about the "logistical issues" involved? Or does Planned Parenthood stand for the principle that when a woman chooses abortion, she is entitled to a dead baby?

Snow's testimony comes at an inopportune moment for the deniers — the "abortion rights" absolutists who hotly deny that infants are ever born alive during botched abortions — because in Philadelphia, an abortionist is on trial.

Dr. Kermit Gosnell is on trial for murder in the deaths of one woman and seven second trimester babies. The 41-year-old woman had sought an abortion and was given an overdose of narcotics at Gosnell's clinic. The seven babies were all born alive, according to the indictment. Gosnell then used scissors to "snip" their spinal columns. One of his assistants, who pled guilty to third-degree murder, said that such "snippings" were "routine" for late-term abortions — so there were probably many more than seven.

Gosnell wasn't at all particular about gestational age. An ultrasound technician recorded the age of one baby as 29.4 weeks, or about 7.5 months. In Pennsylvania, abortions are not permitted after 24 weeks (and survival is above 85 percent for babies born at 27 weeks). In one case, a nurse testified that a baby cried after being born. Gosnell snipped his neck and told the nurse that there was nothing to worry about. He was placed in a basin on a counter. Another large baby was disposed of in a shoebox, but he was too large and his feet dangled over the sides. In another case, Gosnell allegedly joked with a nurse that a baby was so big "he could have walked to the bus stop."

Gosnell seems to be a particularly freakish "provider." He kept fetal feet in jars in an office prosecutors described as a "house of horrors." (Pictures are on the Internet, but beware: They are graphic.)

Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California who engaged in an unwise colloquy with then-Senator Rick Santorum about when infants deserve to be treated as people, spoke for many of the caring elite when she said that life begins when "you take the baby home from the hospital."

Some day, our descendants will look back at this and ask how we could have tamely accepted such barbarism. A special obloquy will attach to the Orwellians who call it compassion.

Please vote:
  • Only group members can vote in this poll.
  1. 19% - Conservative: pro-life
  2. 11% - Liberal: pro-life
  3. 9% - Conservative: pro-choice
  4. 57% - Liberal: pro-choice
  5. 3% - can't decide

Replies

  • Donna6503
    April 2, 2013 at 7:21 AM

    Mona Charen has been a right winger for as long as I can remember, this seems like a reworded copy she has made for years.

  • Billiejeens
    April 2, 2013 at 7:34 AM

    I normally only skim articles, but since Mona Charen is an icon, I took the time to actually read it.

    What did you find biased?

  • Veni.Vidi.Vici.
    April 2, 2013 at 7:42 AM


    Quoting Billiejeens:

    I normally only skim articles, but since Mona Charen is an icon, I took the time to actually read it.

    What did you find biased?


    It's a deeply felt conviction among liberals that they are the caring party. It's not too much to say that liberals are quite confident that they are nicer, more moral people than conservatives.

    It must require truly titanic powers of denial for the "moral" and "compassionate" party to maintain its position on abortion — a position that leads them into some macabre rationalizations. Consciences among the morally superior party are agreeably quiescent.

  • Billiejeens
    April 2, 2013 at 7:51 AM

     


    Quoting Veni.Vidi.Vici.:


    Quoting Billiejeens:

    I normally only skim articles, but since Mona Charen is an icon, I took the time to actually read it.

    What did you find biased?


    It's a deeply felt conviction among liberals that they are the caring party. It's not too much to say that liberals are quite confident that they are nicer, more moral people than conservatives.

    It must require truly titanic powers of denial for the "moral" and "compassionate" party to maintain its position on abortion — a position that leads them into some macabre rationalizations. Consciences among the morally superior party are agreeably quiescent.


     I am of the understanding that you mean the red part.

    How is it bias to state the Liberal Position?

  • coolmommy2x
    April 2, 2013 at 7:52 AM
    Liberal doesn't always equal pro-abortion either.
  • rfurlongg
    April 2, 2013 at 7:54 AM
    I never met anyone that fits in a neat little label box.
  • Bookwormy
    April 2, 2013 at 8:05 AM
    I am pro-privacy as the SCOTUS defined it in Roe v Wade. I think that most, but not all, liberals are as they are compassionate toward already living women & teen girls & don't want to go back to back alley rusted hanger abortions where both they & fetuses died.

    That said, once a fetus is *100% completely outside the vagina* it is a baby & not a fetus & deserves medical treatment or hospice/palliative care services.
  • kaylamom2004
    April 2, 2013 at 8:11 AM

    TIP:  When you make a poll, there needs to be a QUESTION. Providing an article for background info is good .... but you still need a QUESTION

  • diospira
    April 2, 2013 at 8:19 AM



    Quoting rfurlongg:

    I never met anyone that fits in a neat little label box.


    Good point. I know I don´t, though we sure see those labels thrown around a lot here on CM.

    I gave birth to my son at 25 weeks, and I know that  although he wasn´t viable on his own and needed medical intervention, he had lots of desire to live. If babies like him are being killed, there has to be a disconnect somewhere.

    I am not familiar with the author, but surely this testimony by the PP person has to give most people pause. It goes against our most basic instincts, I would think.




  • Ms.KitKat
    April 2, 2013 at 8:35 AM

     When it's an Op-ed piece it is always biased information. She is a sh*t stirer- that much is obvious.

Current Events & Hot Topics

Active Posts in All Groups
More Active Posts
Featured Posts in All Groups
More Featured Posts
close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN