Christian conservative radio hosts Kevin Swanson and Dave Buehner are not exactly big fans of feminism in any of its forms. So far this month, they have opined that a woman fired for being too attractive shouldnât have been working for a man who wasnât her husband in the first place; that âsocialistâ single women are taking over America; and that Sandra Fluke isnât âladylikeâ enough to be considered for Woman of the Year.
On Tuesdayâs edition of Generations Radio, Swanson and Buehner sat down in Swansonâs basement studio to discuss a report they came across that claims ârising college costs are driving a new trend called âSugar Daddies.ââ This led to a wide-ranging discussion of the scourge of womenâs independence and a new unified theory of feminism.
There are âtwo forms of feminism,â Buehner argued. There are âcuteâ feminists like Sarah Palin who will find jobs in the âmarketplaceâ and âget themselves a husbandâ but will ânever submit to the husband, in fact they will use their power probably to make their husband submit to them.â Then, there are the âuglyâ feminists whose âlack of attractiveness has not given them access to power that they wanted in the marketplace.â These âattractively challengedâ feminists will only find careers in academia and in government agencies, for instance, âyou can run the EPA.â
What all these feminists have in common, Swanson argues, is that âall of them want to be free from the familyâ and together with âthe homosexualsâ are âdestroying society.â Buehner speculates that in the future, feminism will be remembered as âa time in which women lost the love of their childrenâ and âdecided to become selfish, narcissistic, family-destroying whores.â
Swanson: Now remember, the goal is that these women have to be independent. The goal is lots and lots of birth control. The goal is lots and lots and lots of fornication. The goal is abortion. The day-after pill will help. And it will help a lot. Remember, the goal is to get that girl a job because she needs no stinkinâ husband, sheâs got the fascist corporation and government-mandated insurance programs and socialist welfare that will take care of her womb to tomb. Who needs a cotton-pickinâ husband? Who needs a family? Thatâs pretty much the worldview thatâs dominating, my friends. Thatâs what the college is all about.
Buehner: Because her feminist professors have told her her husband will abuse her, she will be like a slave to him. Instead she will just go to the slave market and sell herself, at least sell her body, to the highest bidder. See, thatâs much, much better!
Swanson: And Dave, you talk about the two kinds of feminists now, this is your new division, you say thereâs two kinds of feminists.
Buehner: There are.
Swanson: All of them want to be free from the family. They want to be free from the husband. Who needs a stinkinâ husband? Who wants to be submitting to a husband and find security in the family when she can find security in the state or a sugar daddy for the four years that she needs to get through college?
Buehner: Right. Actually, youâre talking about perhaps even a third stream of feminism. Thereâs the Sarah Palin kind of feminism that wants to have a husband, just not one to submit to. And she still wants to..
Swanson: But talk about the two forms of feminism you see that are rising today.
Buehner: Right, there are two forms of feminism, and it actually has to do with a division of how attractive a woman is. So, you have the group that is very attractive, theyâre in the sororities, theyâre gonna be in the beauty contests. Theyâre actually going to get the good jobs. Theyâre going to leverage their attractiveness in the marketplace because it has a market value. Marketing. It helps market who you are. Theyâre going to proceed, now they will probably some of them become the Sarah Palin-style feminists, theyâll get themselves a husband, but theyâll never be dependent on the husband, theyâll never submit to the husband, in fact they will use their power probably to make their husband submit to them.
Swanson: Okay, so you have the cute feminists.
Buehner: Right, you have the good-looking ones.
Swanson: Well, who are the others?
Buehner: Well, the other ones are those who we should say are, um, attractive-deficient. And they have not beenâŚ
Swanson: Thatâs nicely put. Attractively challenged.
Buehner: Attractively challenged. Optically challenged. These are the kinds that will look for careers mostly likely in academia.
Swanson: Now, just to say, theyâre ugly. Theyâre the feminazis that Rush Limbaugh likes to refer to.
Buehner: Right, right, and theyâre generally very angry about it because their attractiveâŚor their lack of attractiveness has not given them access to power that they wanted in the marketplace. So they can get jobsâŚ
Swanson: And theyâre certainly not going to get a lot of power sexually.
Buehner: No, but they can get jobs in the government bureaucracy, they can work as an FDA administrator, or you can actually run the EPA if you want, or academia. Academiaâs actually the best place because you can be angry, ugly and you can also get tenure. Itâs great, itâs the big trifecta.
Swanson: Youâre gonna make some people mad about what youâve just said. There will be some very angry feminists.
Buehner: You mean there will be angrier angry feminists.
Swanson: Angrier angry feminists are gonna come at you for what you just said, and probably from our listening audience, because if we tick anybody off weâre ticking two different folks off, the feminists and the homosexuals, they canât stand this kind of stuff.
Buehner: Neither one of them have a high regard for the family or for the Word of God.
Swanson: Thatâs true, yeah, youâre right, youâre right, youâre right. And theyâre the ones who are destroying society.
Buehner: The systems we are living in are coming down before our very eyes, the fiat currency wonât last, the corporate economies, theyâre going to collapse. Whatâs going to last will be those who go back to a biblical worldview. I believe history will go back to this period of time and will look at feminism and say there was a time in which women lost the love of their children. They no longer cared about having children, they no longer loved their children, they no longer loved their husbands, where for all of history women very much cared about protecting the family. Now they only cared about themselves. They were riled up into a froth about how they were victims of society, patriarchal society, and they decided to become selfish, narcissistic, family-destroying whores.
It's almost artful how they manage to stuff in just about every right-wing buzzword and talking point in such a short rant. It makes no sense, I'm just impressed!
It's pretty obvious that they hate women, so I'm not sure what else needs to be said.
Wow, those evil ugly women who couldn't get husbands or sexual power by being a slut, so they can only take refuge in being smart and qualified for their jobs!
They seem very angry that the cute women don't want husbands anymore. They aren't as upset that the ugly women are going to college and not marrying the ugly guys that have no hope for a cute girl.
Such angry angry men. Penis envy transformed to womb envy
by lga1965January 25, 2013 at 11:39 PM
But you know what is the saddest thing about this ? There are lots of women ( conservative ones ) who agree with these low IQ dorks. They don't aspire to college and they want to stay home and let their hubbies be in charge and they pretend they know nothing and they have lotsa babies....etc.
Its like they are stuck in the 1950's.Just pathetic.
by BookwormyJanuary 25, 2013 at 11:47 PM
Well, that was wasted time in my life that I can never get bacl!