News & Politics

Featured Posts
sweet-a-kins
Partisan Evolution Gap? Politically Insignificant, GOP Says
January 3 at 6:20 AM

Partisan Evolution Gap? Politically Insignificant, GOP Says

A display of a series of skeletons showing the evolution of humans at the Peabody Museum, New Haven, Conn., circa 1935.

A display of a series of skeletons showing the evolution of humans at the Peabody Museum, New Haven, Conn., circa 1935.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

A new national survey showing that the share of Republicans who believe in evolution has tumbled from 54 to 43 percent over the past four years comes at an inopportune time.

The Pew Research poll suggests that the GOP, already struggling with an identity crisis and facing ferocious internal battles, is out of sync on the issue with independents and young voters, who are far more likely to believe in the science of evolution than their forebears.

(The survey showed that 68 percent of adults between the ages of 18 and 29 believe that humans have evolved over time; less than half of those ages 65 and older share that belief. Two-thirds of independent voters also believe humans have evolved over time.)

But just how politically significant is the finding, which shows that the evolution belief gap between Republicans and Democrats has since 2009 grown from 10 percentage points to 24 points?

For partisan critics eager to paint the GOP as anti-science, the results feed a well-tended narrative that includes a similar and growing partisan divide on global warming. Pew survey results released in October showed that 46 percent of Republicans said there was "no solid evidence" the earth is warming; just 26 percent of Democrats shared that view.

For Republican strategists like Whit Ayres, however, the evolution results are politically insignificant. More than anything, he says, it reflects the trend of both parties gravitating toward their more extreme wings, which, in the GOP, includes evangelical Christians. He argues that it is unlikely to define the GOP negatively or otherwise in any sustaining way.

"It's not a particularly surprising result, especially if you follow Gallup data on how Americans interpret the Bible," says Ayres, of North Star Opinion Research. "There's a significant minority of Americans who believe that the Bible is the actual true word of God."

That minority, according to Gallup's 2011 survey, is 30 percent of all Americans, a percentage that's been fairly consistent for more than two decades. The number tracks closely with Pew's new evolution results, which showed that 33 percent of all adults surveyed said they do not believe that humans evolved.

However, Pew experts note that differences in religious commitment and beliefs between political parties don't fully explain the partisan divide.

"White evangelical Protestants — that's not what's going on in terms of the growth in the partisan gap," says Cary Funk, senior researcher at the Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project.

The results suggest, she says, the increasing politicization of issues relating to science.

"There have been changes in who Republicans are," she says, "but those changes mostly took place before 2009" when Pew last conducted a survey on evolution beliefs.

Says Alan Cooperman, director of religion research at Pew: "There are growing political divisions on a variety of issues we don't think of inherently as political — the environment, global warming, immigration, and measures like religiosity."

However, those changes might not reflect Republicans' actually changing their minds about evolution, Cooperman says.

He sees American adults sorting and re-sorting themselves politically, and the composition of the public changing as well — with younger adults who are less religious and more Democratic-leaning joining the electorate.

"The issue of evolution has become more of a political touchstone, at least for some Republicans who may be more skeptical of science as a whole, and more willing now to express that skepticism," Cooperman says.

Vin Weber, a former Minnesota Republican congressman and now a Washington-based GOP strategist, says he would "resist characterizing this as evidence of a war on science, which I think is BS."

"I suspect this is a reflection of a trend we've seen, where the most educated people who used to be Republicans are now Democrats, and people with less educational status are now moving into the Republican Party," Weber says.

"Added to that is a realignment along religious lines, with the most religious lining up with the GOP," he said.

One interesting note on the Pew evolution survey: The first question asked was intended to be one rooted in science — simply asking Americans whether they believe humans have existed in present form since the beginning or have evolved over time.

Those who said they believe humans have evolved were asked a follow-up question with a religion aspect: Was evolution a function of natural selection or did God or a "supreme being" play a role?

A quarter of those surveyed who said they believe in evolution also believe that "a supreme being guided the evolution of living things for the purpose of creating humans and other life in the form it exists today."

"I don't know how you can believe in God and not believe in that," Weber said. "You believe in God, and think he's sort of a disinterested third party?"

As a political issue, evolution is simply a part of a larger cultural battle, Ayres, the GOP strategist, says, that helps explain the distinctions between red states and blue states.

His theory?

Evolution is to the coming presidential election what the death penalty was to Bill Clinton's successful run for president in 1992 — a "nonstarter" as an issue. Clinton, as president,expanded the death penalty, anathema to many in his party base.

"Bill Clinton redefined the Democratic Party in 1992 as a very different entity than it was defined in 1972 by George McGovern," Ayres says. "The Republican nominee in 2016 will redefine the Republican Party for the modern age, and who that nominee turns out to be will have an enormous effect on how the party is perceived on some of these cultural issues."

Until then, caricatures of both parties will be fed by fascinating data like those served up in Pew's evolution survey. Godless Democrats? Anti-intellectual Republicans?

Pick your data; there are plenty out there to feed the divide.

Replies

  • JanuaryBaby06
    January 3 at 4:41 PM

    Yeah, I am not digging alot of the messages the ultra-Conservatives have been sending out recently. I don't think Evolution is going to play a big part in the next Presidental debates but I think it should. I'll leave it at that.

  • Billiejeens
    January 3 at 4:47 PM

    angry michelle obama hell

    See what happens when one does not use the proper equipment.

    A wide angle lens would have shown this on the far left.

  • Momniscient
    January 3 at 4:49 PM

    I saw this and had to laugh. It's not significant because our base has become nutjobs and that doesn't define us significantly?

    Oh okay.

  • sweet-a-kins
    January 3 at 5:03 PM

     it's a testament to the stupidity that has taken over that party. I know many republicans that are nothing like what the base is becoming...they are holding out hope that this is just a temporary phase...

    Some have left the party and others have started voting other party's but still consider themelves repulican...

    Everything seems so extreme....maybe it will right itself...or maybe an third party will come out of it

    Quoting JanuaryBaby06:

    Yeah, I am not digging alot of the messages the ultra-Conservatives have been sending out recently. I don't think Evolution is going to play a big part in the next Presidental debates but I think it should. I'll leave it at that.

     

  • JanuaryBaby06
    January 3 at 5:23 PM

    I am registered Republican. Whenever I state my Political affiliation I always make sure to state that I am Registered that way. I do not always vote that way & am not a text book Republican.... many wouldnt consider me one at all. I don't really fit in either party. I will never ever ever vote in an ultra Conservative or an overly Religious Conservative for anything though. I reside more in the gray area. I'd consider myself a  Libral Republican or a COnservative Democrat as far as our main parties go.

    Nothing fixes itself someone is going to have to seize the oppertunity to change the party and garner a following. The Republicans have reinvented themselves and their message before they can do it again.

    Quoting sweet-a-kins:

     it's a testament to the stupidity that has taken over that party. I know many republicans that are nothing like what the base is becoming...they are holding out hope that this is just a temporary phase...

    Some have left the party and others have started voting other party's but still consider themelves repulican...

    Everything seems so extreme....maybe it will right itself...or maybe an third party will come out of it

    Quoting JanuaryBaby06:

    Yeah, I am not digging alot of the messages the ultra-Conservatives have been sending out recently. I don't think Evolution is going to play a big part in the next Presidental debates but I think it should. I'll leave it at that.

     


  • SallyMJ
    by SallyMJ
    January 3 at 5:39 PM

    The "science" of evolution. Even though it is the THEORY of evolution.

    That has been proven by the scientific method, yes?

    Good one.

    But I still think you are a cool chick.  :)


  • Clairwil
    January 3 at 5:53 PM


    Quoting sweet-a-kins:

    Cary Funk, senior researcher at the Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project.

    The results suggest, she says, the increasing politicization of issues relating to science.

    "The issue of evolution has become more of a political touchstone, at least for some Republicans who may be more skeptical of science as a whole, and more willing now to express that skepticism," Cooperman says.

    As a political issue, evolution is simply a part of a larger cultural battle, Ayres, the GOP strategist, says

     "The Republican nominee in 2016 will redefine the Republican Party for the modern age, and who that nominee turns out to be will have an enormous effect on how the party is perceived on some of
    these cultural issues."

    When the issue is science, why do people listen to politicians rather than scientists?

    Reality isn't a "cultural issue".    It just 'is'.   We don't get to each live in a different version.

  • blueforewolf
    January 4 at 2:11 AM

    oh ducky ducky what am I going to do with you   http://www.livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-scientific-theory-definition-of-theory.html  a scientific theory has a different meaning than the lay meaning for theory  

    Quoting SallyMJ:

    The "science" of evolution. Even though it is the THEORY of evolution.

    That has been proven by the scientific method, yes?

    Good one.

    But I still think you are a cool chick.  :)



  • SallyMJ
    by SallyMJ
    January 4 at 3:46 AM

    Right. No, it does not.

    Quoting blueforewolf:

    oh ducky ducky what am I going to do with you   http://www.livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-scientific-theory-definition-of-theory.html  a scientific theory has a different meaning than the lay meaning for theory  

    Quoting SallyMJ:

    The "science" of evolution. Even though it is the THEORY of evolution.

    That has been proven by the scientific method, yes?

    Good one.

    But I still think you are a cool chick.  :)




  • romalove
    January 4 at 8:03 AM


    Quoting SallyMJ:

    Right. No, it does not.

    Quoting blueforewolf:

    oh ducky ducky what am I going to do with you   http://www.livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-scientific-theory-definition-of-theory.html  a scientific theory has a different meaning than the lay meaning for theory  

    Quoting SallyMJ:

    The "science" of evolution. Even though it is the THEORY of evolution.

    That has been proven by the scientific method, yes?

    Good one.

    But I still think you are a cool chick.  :)




    You've arbitrarily decided that scientific theory does not mean something different than a general theory even though scientists will tell you that this is so?

    That would make having any science based discussion with you impossible, because you deny what science even is, says, or does.

News & Politics

Active Posts in All Groups
More Active Posts
Featured Posts in All Groups
More Featured Posts