News & Politics

Featured Posts
The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night”
July 3, 2013 at 12:13 PM

The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night”

“Gardasil and Cervarix Don’t Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren’t Tested”

Dr. Diane Harper

Dr. Diane Harper

By Sarah Cain
July 2, 2013

Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines.

She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009.

Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.

“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all.”  – Joan Robinson

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle.

All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions.

At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.

Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.

About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.”  - Dr. Diane Harper

One must understand how the establishment’s word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of “science”.

When they report that untreated cases “can” lead to something that “may” lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it. In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless.

In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of him being struck by a meteorite.

Why do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system usually kills anyway?


  • kcangel63
    July 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM
    We don't vaccinate any more. If we did, I would NEVER have my kids get the HPV vaccine.
  • Dragonmamas
    July 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM
    Cha ching, that's why.
  • nanaofsix531
    July 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM

    Yep.You can take that to the bank.

    Quoting Dragonmamas:

    Cha ching, that's why.

  • JoJoBean8
    July 4, 2013 at 11:59 AM

    We don't vaccinate. They care more about the money then the children.

  • Meadowchik
    July 4, 2013 at 12:15 PM


    Quoting nanaofsix531:

    Yep.You can take that to the bank.

    Quoting Dragonmamas:

    Cha ching, that's why.

    Unfortunately we have signs in our French doctor's office promoting the vaccine. I hope her admission makes an impact and decreases pressure on parents (everywhere) to use this vaccine.

    Great post, nanaofsix :)

  • Jenn77781
    July 4, 2013 at 12:21 PM
    Quoting Dragonmamas:

    Cha ching, that's why.

    So true...
  • JanuaryBaby06
    July 6, 2013 at 3:23 PM

    i dont have girls but if i had no child of mine would be getting that crap.

  • gsprofval
    July 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM

    When Merck first started promoting Gardasil to make money, my doctor tried to tell me it was ok to give to my young daughter.

    I told her NO WAY because there was no long-term testing and no one knew how it would affect girls years later. Of course, most doctor offices were getting kickbacks from Merck for every Gardasil vaccine.

    Well, lo and behold, shortly after that, I had several students write papers about problems with Gardasil and how awful it was--and there are many issues up to an including death. This caused me to do my own research and my students were right!

    Now, Merck is saying even boys should be given Gardasil vaccines and we already know it doesn't protect against anything Merck says it does and the complications from it are too life-threatening for it to even be on the market.

  • kcangel63
    July 6, 2013 at 4:03 PM
    Sad but true.

    Money is more important than the lives and health of others. :(

    Quoting Dragonmamas:

    Cha ching, that's why.

News & Politics

Active Posts in All Groups
More Active Posts
Featured Posts in All Groups
More Featured Posts