I'd prefer Ron Paul...but, seems they're keeping him out of the race, as much as possible and shutting out Gary Johnson, too. So, out of the two evils, I would DEFINITELY think Romney would do MUCH better than Obama.
I don't care for Obama, he's had his 4yrs & it didn't work out so well. I'm not for Romney, due to ...I feel that he has ulterior motives. The thought of 4 years via a Republican Pres, makes me cringe!
I also feel that both are out of touch with reality. I am now an Independent voter this upcoming election, ...due to the 2 that are running have sooooo turned me OFF, regarding the ability to get anything accomplished for the good of the people for which they supposedly represent.
While Obama visits Vegas @ some $800-$1300 bucks a night for 3 nights, meanwhile asking for $10 via cellphone marketing.....uh, I can NO longer tolerate this kind of fund raising so the candidate can afford to plow thru my hard earned monies.
Regarding the debate.....I'm not looking for "zingers" per Romney, to change my mind upon the upcoming vote, how rediculous can it get??
I guess why I would vote for a President doesn't come down to him/her being "down to earth", "relatable", and "collective". I prefer "reliable", "experienced" and "Pro America!". Obama not trying to be someone he's not??? Seriously?? The man is the biggest fake I've ever seen. IMO
Out of the 2 options above. I choose Obama.
He's more down to earth, relatable, collective. He does not try to be someone he's not.